11/7/2023 0 Comments Introduction to pacman arch linuxThe pacman page has no meaning unless you know how the repository is maintained. The statements about pacman do not make sense unless you know how the repository is maintained. It should, because the way pacman functions can not be understood or even explained without knowing the way the repository is maintained. See my answer below, this belongs at most to Official repositories. Doru001 ( talk) 12:00, 1 August 2015 (UTC) > The rolling release should be the first paragraph in pacman. There was a danger of an editing war, and I just backed down. They were not interested in clarity or logic, but in some details which they knew less. The structure of pacman is as it is as a result of the fact that experienced users won the argument against beginners like me. If you want to use an external reference, that is great, but it should be very visible, because any newcomer comes to pacman wiki to understand the manual. The rolling release should be the first paragraph in pacman. Go to history, and if you have new arguments, recover the history and answer. Alad ( talk) 15:23, 28 July 2015 (UTC) I can't continue a discussion forever. If the pacman article structure is unclear, then improve the article, not a separately maintained duplicate. There is an iniative to merge the defining points of Arch (including "Rolling release") in one article feel free to voice your opinion in Talk:The Arch Way. As to "rolling release", this term is explained on Wikipedia: Wikipedia:Rolling release. Nothing prevents you from opening a new one (or even restore the old one from history). Doru001 ( talk) 11:41, 28 July 2015 (UTC)Īfter a discussion was closed, it is deleted three days after for maintenance purposes, not censorship. The consequences of using -Syyuu are still unclear to me today. And when something is more complicated, it is emphasized, not overlooked. It is for beginners, and that is the precise reason why it should stand at the beginning of the presentation. In my opinion, when one presents geometry, it begins with assumptions like "two different points determine a straight line". My introductory article of course is not mentioned in the list of related articles on Pacman page.Īnd now of course you want to delete it all, because it doubles the main Pacman page. The discussion which led to this compromise of course has been deleted. The wiki page begins with a long introduction about pacman configuration, which I still did not need until today, after years of usage. The first "hint" on the wiki page is found in paragraph 2.3 (close to the end), which mysteriously mentions "the nature of Arch's rolling release approach". The words "rolling" and "archive" do not even appear in the pacman manual. I don't know if this is on purpose or not, but it renders the arch package management system incomprehensible to a newcomer. There is no explanation on the fundamental "rolling archive" concept in the main Pacman article or in the pacman manual. We came to a compromise, and I wrote this page, which I wish I could find easily myself when I started using pacman. They have been readily removed from there, because they were for beginners. As a result, I began to complete the wiki on pacman with these simple statements which can help a beginner to find his way. When I started with arch linux I was disappointed by the lack of a friendly introduction to pacman.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |